The Alaska History & Cultural Studies Website is a resource offered by the Alaska Humanities Forum.
The site will be undergoing a remodel after the 2012/13 school year, please help by providing us with your feedback. Thank you!
|
|
The Next Generation Corporations must decide whether to include Natives born after 1971. By CATHY BROWN THE JUNEAU EMPIRE Darrell Berntsen, 28, received $6,000 in dividends this year from his Native corporations. His sister, 25-year-old Carrie, got nothing. And it's not just the money, she said. "I can't go to corporation meetings. I can't vote for who's going to be the board members of our corporation," she said. "They're a part of it and we're not. They call us the afterborns." The issue of "afterborns," Alaska Natives born after 1971, creates a dilemma for Native corporations around the state trying to balance a desire to share with the younger generation against a push to pay higher dividends to current stockholders. "It's a Catch-22 situation," said Berntsen's father, Ron, a board member for the village corporation in Old Harbor. Some Alaska Natives said they fought for the settlement act to benefit future generations, and they hate excluding the young people from its benefits. Adding them, however, immediately dilutes the value of the stock for existing shareholders. The math is simple: If $1 million worth of dividends must be spread among 8,000 shareholders instead of 4,000, the checks will be half as much. Arctic Slope and NANA automatically enroll shareholders' children when they're born, although NANA requires they be at least a quarter Native. Doyon enrolled those born through 1992. The board will consider in 2002 whether to open the rolls again to those born since 1992, said Robin Renfro, Doyon's vice president of shareholder relations and administration. "That was a very, very heart-wrenching issue," said state Sen. Georgianna Lincoln, who is a Doyon board member. "There were young people that were talking and walking and thinking and saying, 'How come I'm not a shareholder? I'm Native. I belong to the village."' The board put the question out to its shareholders, and they agreed to let the younger generation in. Adding the next generation of Natives to the rolls increased Doyon's shareholder list from 9,000 to nearly 14,000; NANA's from 4,900 to close to 10,000; Arctic Slope's from 3,700 to 8,000.
In all three corporations the newly issued stock reverts to the corporation when the shareholder dies. The addition didn't dramatically reduce dividends at Doyon, Renfro said, because the corporation gave shares to its new members gradually. Children under 18 received just 30 shares; when they reach adulthood, they are given another 70 shares. Arctic Slope managed to keep dividends from declining by increasing profits, Arctic Slope Chief Administrative Officer Conrad Bagne said. Arctic Slope is one of the most profitable of the 13 regionals. NANA adds about 275 children a year, spokeswoman Sarah Scanlan said. While individual checks would be larger without the provision, many families' overall income from dividends goes up because more family members have shares, she said. There are other ways Natives born after 1971 can become shareholders. Inheritance is one; "gifting" is another. Gifting is a provision that allows shareholders to give some or all of their shares to a descendant or a sibling. Cook Inlet Region Inc. CEO and President Carl Marrs said he thinks most of those born after 1971 will eventually have stock through inheritance or gifting. At CIRI, the number of shareholders has changed from 6,280 originally in 1971 to a little more than 6,900 now, due to inheritance or gifting. Sealaska has added just 900 of its more than 16,000 shareholders through gifting. Gene Makurin, a former CEO for the Unalaska village corporation, thinks it's fine that those born after 1971 aren't automatically added. Makurin believes children wouldn't understand the shares or the corporation. And he doesn't like the idea of decreasing dividends by issuing new shares. Other Natives, however, are troubled by the issue.
Excluding children conflicts with Tlingit law, said Rosita Worl, an anthropologist and Sealaska board member. "In the past just by being born in a clan you have ownership rights in that clan," she said. Sealaska is still wrestling with the issue of whether to enroll all those born after 1971, said spokeswoman Vikki Mata. An earlier advisory vote showed shareholders nearly evenly split. Shareholder Ethan Petticrew finds that conflict deeply disturbing. "It's made us greedy," said Petticrew, a Sealaska shareholder, living in Atka in the Aleutian Islands. "Our ancestors are probably sick about it. They're probably up there screaming mad, saying, 'Why aren't you letting the children in?"'
View this page as an Adobe PDF file |
|